Version control is a crucial component of modern software development, enabling teams to collaborate, manage code, and keep track of changes. AWS CodeCommit and GitHub are two of the most popular version control platforms. In this article, we will look at the differences between these two platforms in depth, including their features, advantages, and use cases.
Table of Contents
What is AWS CodeCommit?
AWS CodeCommit is a version control system that you may use to securely store and manage cloud assets (such as source code, documents, and binary files). See Pricing for details on CodeCommit’s pricing.
Hosted by Amazon Web Services, AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed version control system. It assists companies in getting rid of the need to scale their infrastructure to match the new needs of their sector or manage their source control systems. It enables you to reduce administrative activities like software updates, configuration, and—most importantly—hardware provisioning while achieving remarkable durability and uptime. To configure notifications and guarantee that their team members receive emails about significant events, AWS developers can incorporate AWS tags into their repositories.
Going into further detail, AWS makes it easy for customers to learn about their repository and copy it to their workstations to establish a local repository from which they can push updates to the CodeCommit repository.
What is the GitHub?
GitHub offers developers advanced features such as distributed version control, source code management, and access controls. Tom Preston-Werner, P.J. Hyett, Scott Chacon, and Chris Wanstrath developed GitHub in 2008 in San Francisco, using the Ruby on Rails technology as its foundation.
GitHub began as a platform to simplify code sharing and has now grown into an application used by millions of individuals to store over two million code repositories. As a result, GitHub is the world’s most popular code hosting platform. Consider GitHub to be your Git server without all the bells and whistles. In other words, GitHub functions similarly to social networking, allowing engineers to discuss concerns while also building, sharing, and documenting their projects.
If we go deeper into its functionality and technicalities, developers can securely save and maintain their code. Aside from storage and management, it also allows them to monitor and regulate changes, making development easier for teams. Each team member can easily explore Git for speedy collaboration and version control.
AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub: Comparison
1. Integration – AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub
AWS CodeCommit can be beneficial for a wide range of applications and solutions. Developers can combine AWS CodeCommit with other AWS services like Cloud9, CloudFormation, Amplify, CloudTrail, CloudWatch Events, CodeGuru Reviewer, CodeBuild, CodePipeline, CodeStar, Elastic Beanstalk, and Lambda.
However, its most notable integrations are with Access Management (IAM) and AWS Identity. By integrating AWS CodeCommit with IAM, developers can control user access to their repositories, ensure security, and prevent unwanted access.
However, suppose we concentrate on Github’s interaction with popular third-party programs such as Prisma Cloud, TravisCI, Sublime Text, IntelliJ, and collaboration platforms such as Slack, Asana, and Trello by incorporating sophisticated collaboration solutions.
2. Collaboration – AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub
With AWS CodeCommit, developers can create as many repositories as they need, with no restriction on request and more than 1000 repositories by default. Furthermore, it enables them to save and version any file while tracking it by setting notifications and alerts on each repository to guarantee that progress is properly recorded.
On the other hand, GitHub, which thrives on its forking collaboration tool that allows developers to co-edit and share files and code with others, cannot be surpassed. It includes social network features such as feeds, wikis, followers, and a social network graph that describes the most recent fork and how developers work on different repository versions. The best thing to remember is that anyone can download public repositories from GitHub, but only enrolled users can add, manage, and initiate discussions with other developers.
Nonetheless, GitHub wins out over AWS CodeCommit in the collaboration category, thanks to its interactive social media-like environment that allows developers to create a profile and share/connect with other writers.
3. Storage limit – AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub
AWS CodeCommit has no limitations on file type or size. As a result, you can save any file’s n number. While GitHub limits the size of files. It allows you to store files smaller than 100 MB. If you surpass the maximum file storage limit, it pushes blocks to the repository.
4. Security – AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub
AWS CodeCommit uses AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), which makes it extremely secure. Because using IAM roles allows you to share repositories with certain people while still controlling access to them. As a result, only a small number of users can make updates, access the repository, and so on. It also supports third-party authentication via MFA.
On the other hand, Git is managed by GitHub users. GitHub is ideal for publishing free, open-source libraries and integrates seamlessly with a wide range of third-party technologies. Regarding security, it is not as future-proof as AWS CodeCommit.
5. Pricing – AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub
Both systems provide a free tier; however, developers with greater specs may choose to subscribe to the commercial plans. GitHub offers three plans: Team, Enterprise, and Free.
Github: The free plan is ideal for small teams and developers wishing to gain community support. It includes 500MB of GitHub package storage, 2,000 monthly action minutes, and an unlimited number of public or private repositories and collaborators.
The enterprise package is priced at approximately $21 per user each month.
The Team package, on the other hand, costs approximately $4 per month and includes all free plan features and code owners. It provides 3,000 monthly action minutes and 2GB of GitHub package storage.
AWS CodeCommit: It includes 50GB monthly storage, unlimited repositories, and 50GB monthly storage.
The main thing to know is that it is available to both new and existing AWS users and does not expire after the 12-month Free Plan period.
Aside from the initial five, additional active users will have to pay $1 per month to utilize the service, which includes a separate 10GB monthly storage and the ability to perform an additional 2,000 git requests.
Other features
| Features | AWS CodeCommit | GitHub |
| Pricing | Pay per active user and data storage | Free plan with paid tiers for advanced features |
| Security | AWS-native security protocols | 2FA, encrypted communication, robust access control |
| Integration with CI/CD | CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy | GitHub Actions, Jenkins, Travis CI |
| Collaboration | Limited to private repositories, no open-source focus | Extensive social coding features, open-source projects |
| Ease of use | More suited to AWS users | User-friendly and beginner-friendly interface |
| Community support | Limited community focus | Strong community, extensive resources |
Use case for AWS code-commit
AWS CodeCommit is ideal for the organizations that :
- If you are already using AWS services and want to maintain an integrated development pipeline.Â
- Need enterprise-level security and compliance, such as encryption, auditing, and fine-grained access control through IAM.
- Are primarily working with private repositories and do not need the collaborative features of platforms like GitHub.
Use Cases for GitHub
GitHub is best suited for:
- Open-source projects where collaboration with a global developer community is essential.
- Teams that prioritize ease of use and a user-friendly interface.
- Developers or organizations that want access to GitHub Actions for CI/CD without needing external tools.
- Projects that require a large number of third-party integrations and flexibility.
Advantages of AWS CodeCommit and GitHub
| Aspects | AWS code commit | Github |
| Security | Integrated with AWS’s robust security framework, including IAM and CloudTrail. | Offers two-factor authentication (2FA) and encrypted communication. |
| Repositories are encrypted both in transit and at rest.Fine-grained control over repository access through IAM policies. | GitHub’s acquisition by Microsoft enhances security with regular updates and integrations. | |
| Integration | Deep integration with other AWS services (CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CloudWatch). | Easily integrates with third-party tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI. |
| Ideal for teams already working in the AWS ecosystem. | GitHub Actions provide native CI/CD functionality for automated workflows. | |
| Scalability | Scales effortlessly with your project, with no manual intervention required. | Can handle projects of any size, from small to large open-source projects with massive contributors. |
| Private Repos | All repositories are private by default, offering better control and confidentiality. | Offers unlimited private repositories even on the free tier. |
| Cost | Offers a free tier with 5 active users and 50 GB of storage, suitable for small teams. | Free for open-source and private repositories with some limitations in the free tier. |
| Management | Fully managed by AWS, removing the need for infrastructure management. | user-friendly interface simplifies repository management. |
Why Choose SupportFly As an AWS Professional Services Consultant?
As your managed AWS services provider, our goal is to help your business fully utilize AWS. With our managed AWS consulting services, you can focus on your core operations while we manage the complexities of the cloud. As your trusted partner on this cloud journey, we’ll work together to discover new opportunities and drive growth in the digital era.
Choosing the right AWS professional services consultant is crucial for maximizing the benefits of your cloud investment. At SupportFly, we combine extensive experience, cost-efficient strategies, 24×7 services, and robust security to provide unparalleled support and expertise.
Experience
With years of industry experience and a team of AWS-certified professionals, SupportFly brings deep expertise to every project. We have successfully managed and optimized numerous AWS environments, ensuring that your business can leverage best practices and proven strategies.
Cost Efficient
Our cost-efficient approach helps you maximize the value of your AWS investment. We identify opportunities for savings and implement cost-effective solutions without compromising performance or security, allowing you to get the most out of your AWS budget.
24×7 Services
SupportFly offers true around-the-clock availability, ensuring that your AWS environment is always monitored and maintained, no matter the time or day. Our dedicated support team is ready to address any issues and provide assistance whenever you need it, ensuring uninterrupted operations.
Security
Security is at the forefront of everything we do. SupportFly implements robust security measures to protect your data and applications. From regular security audits to compliance checks, we ensure your AWS environment is secure and resilient against threats.
Conclusion
We discovered that while AWS CodeCommit and GitHub differ greatly, they also share a great deal in common. Developers can host safe, scalable private Git repositories with ease thanks to both. Assume that GitHub facilitates the evaluation and exchange of code for open-source, project management, and private development projects by developers. Then, AWS assists them in doing away with the requirement for them to run their source control system smoothly.
GitHub is a great resource for developers searching for a collaborative solution, and AWS CodeCommit is ideal for those looking for free repositories with a large selection of private repositories. Consequently, each has importance. You can pick the one that best fits your goals based on your business requirements.
